Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1029

reference
91-tree-1
name
1029
tree-preservation-order

undefined

91-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.035086 50.862170)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.035015 50.862163,-1.035018 50.862177,-1.035028 50.862189,-1.035043 50.862199,-1.035063 50.862206,-1.035085 50.862208,-1.035107 50.862206,-1.035127 50.862200,-1.035143 50.862190,-1.035153 50.862178,-1.035157 50.862164,-1.035154 50.862150,-1.035144 50.862137,-1.035128 50.862127,-1.035109 50.862121,-1.035087 50.862118,-1.035065 50.862120,-1.035045 50.862127,-1.035029 50.862136,-1.035019 50.862149,-1.035015 50.862163)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL